Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Paty vs Vilius Gaubas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paty vs Gaubas analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Paty vs Vilius Gaubas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paty 1 - 0 Gaubas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paty has won 56.18% of points on their second serve, while Gaubas has won 48.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paty, in recent form, has won 46.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gaubas has won 53.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.5% and 36.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paty has saved 52.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gaubas has saved 56.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paty has won 59.57% of matches played (W/L 28/ 19), with Gaubas winning 67.06% (W/L 57/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paty has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 97/ 72), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Gaubas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 94/ 48), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Paty has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.57% of matches (W/L 28/ 19), where as Gaubas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74% of matches (W/L 37/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paty winning 1 times and Gaubas being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paty winning 2 and Gaubas winning 0. The last match between Paty and Gaubas was at the M25 Lodz, 12-08-2023, Semifinals, Clay with Daniel Paty getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paty and Gaubas have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paty winning 0 times and Gaubas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paty winning 0, and Gaubas 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paty has played against opponents with an average rank of 130.6 while Gaubas has played against players with an average rank of 271.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paty has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gaubas has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paty has converted 40.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gaubas has converted 45.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
674
Rank
664
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
276
Rank
276
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
54% (111-96)
Career Total W/L
63% (109-65)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
65% (28-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Paty | Vilius Gaubas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (28/41) | 63% (30/48) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 89% (25/28) | 53% (16/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (7/13) | 44% (8/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (24/48) | 22% (9/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Paty
Player
Vilius Gaubas
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Paty | Vilius Gaubas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 65% (28/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (15/8) | 59% (60/41) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (124/98) | 53% (521/458) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 67% (22/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 64 | 106 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:43 | 1:54:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 306.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (372/639) | 65% (1889/2925) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (287/372) | 67% (1265/1889) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (150/267) | 49% (505/1036) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (29/72) | 45% (150/333) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (302/745) | 43% (1327/3111) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (16/10) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (7/4) | 73% (11/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 65% (28/43) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 45% (5/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 73% (11/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 95% (21/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 5% (21/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 36% (22/8) |
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Szymon Kielan
Player
Daniel Paty
44%
(
54 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
5
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
4
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
57%
(
40 of
70)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
48 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Jasza Szajrych
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Daniel Paty
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Mariano Tammaro
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Matthias Ujvary
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Aljaz Jeran
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Paty
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Samuel Puskar
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Tobias Smoliner
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Vilius Gaubas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Vilius Gaubas
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
44 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Remy Bertola
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Franco Roncadelli
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
81%
(
95 of
117)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
57 of
117)
115
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Vilius Gaubas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Vilius Gaubas
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Vilius Gaubas
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
23 of
55)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Vilius Gaubas
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Hugo Dellien
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Paty Vs Gaubas Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Paty are available here and Gaubas photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
